Right ON

I think you will run into a lot of opposition on that, try a blog on a tourny that has a shorter clock, you might have a chance on that and it would be different, just like faster blinds, another one that would run into a lot of opposition, personally I think its fine the way it is, and the quality of play is higher, people would play better with the way its set up now.

time to think? no time to play hands on 5 different screens and drink beer and smoke a cig. shorter time limits would ruin my system

I tottaly disagree. A time bank would be good. Sometimes, not every time you need a moment to think through a hand. I know there are abusers, so 60 seconds per game is lots.

we discussed this in richkat's blog yeterday.i agree with jontm's disagreement.turbos are too fast, and i vote for a 60 sec.time bank.ty.

I'm sorry I'm so SLOW

What we need, is some separate tournaments that are limited to players playing a single table. That way, those of us that like to focus on the game we're playing will get a fast game (most timeouts are about multi-table play) and everyone that likes multi-table play can still have their games as well. I started a blog on this - come to my profile and comment opinions on this specifc idea if you like.